Parcel Mapping and
the PLSS
The
attended seminar I was available to attend was from 2:45 pm to 4:00 pm. on Tuesday
afternoon on the 15th of March. This seminar consisted of GIS
professionals and experts discussing the ideas of how to balance the needs in
statewide parcel mapping and positional accuracy as well as how to implement
these in practice.
The
groups came up with ideas for each answer and a spokesperson shared the group’s
ideas with the rest of the room. Ideas for how to balance the needs statewide
for parcel mapping that is more accurate and in cooperation with the public
land survey system seemed to fall along the same lines. Essentially the solution
is to first educate the public so that they understand the need for better and
more accurate maps, the “public” would be the city council members and
community activists. Once education is had a step towards procuring the funds
for this massive mapping project. After funds are gathered it is necessary for
a precise set of goals to be laid out to allow the several organizations
involved in the project to all be on the same page and work in tandem to
produce the new products in a timely manner instead of putting progress off.
The
second question that was discussed in great detail was the multitude of strategies
for PLSS implementation. Many of the spokespeople for each particular group
identified the fact that county boundaries needed to be done first. This seemed
to be a reasonable first step to most people and would allow for more specific
measurements later but this is a required first step that would be relatively
easy to delegate. Along the lines of the first discussion was that the
officials who would be passing bills and funding would need to be literally
sold on the project before more accurate mapping would be possible. They also
discussed the dividing up of counties to different organizations statewide who,
working with the same requirements, would be able to work on their own to
produce surveys that would fit with the rest of the state.
At the
end of the seminar a rather passionate discussion was had on how exactly to go
about beginning this process. As one speaker, “Steve” stated, it is all great
to talk about ideas and goals people in the room have but it is useless to do
nothing about it. He was clearly frustrated with the speed of bureaucracy and
wanted to be able to begin this project as soon as possible. It was neat to see
how excited he was to begin the project.
No comments:
Post a Comment